Main Page
Deanship
The Dean
Dean's Word
Curriculum Vitae
Contact the Dean
Vision and Mission
Organizational Structure
Vice- Deanship
Vice- Dean
KAU Graduate Studies
Research Services & Courses
Research Services Unit
Important Research for Society
Deanship's Services
FAQs
Research
Staff Directory
Files
Favorite Websites
Deanship Access Map
Graduate Studies Awards
Deanship's Staff
Staff Directory
Files
Researches
Contact us
عربي
English
About
Admission
Academic
Research and Innovations
University Life
E-Services
Search
Deanship of Graduate Studies
Document Details
Document Type
:
Thesis
Document Title
:
Criminal responsibility of the crime of breach of trust in Saudi regime and Egyptian law
الحماية الجنائية للمحكم طبقا لنظام التحكيم السعودي
Subject
:
Faculty of Law
Document Language
:
Arabic
Abstract
:
This study aims at discussing the arbitrator’s protection according to the Saudi arbitration system, in terms of the origin, definition, characteristics and sources of arbitration. The nature of the arbitrator’s work and its distinction from related interests, the arbitrator’s right to be protected and the statement of criminal liability were addressed as well. The descriptive, inductive and historical approach was employed in this study to achieve the following: 1) to explain the nature of arbitration in Islamic law and Saudi systems, 2) to explain the general principles of the arbitrator and the legal protection of the arbithrator. The findings revealed that the Saudi regulator did not expressly stipulate in the Saudi Arbitration Law the liability of the arbitrator’s penal and the penalties that ensue from that liability. However, it only limits the arbitrator to the fact that he does a judicial work represented in that, as a public official in the crime of bribery, and thus the provisions of this system apply to him. In addition, the Saudi regulator did not explicitly stipulate in the Saudi Arbitration Law the protection of the arbitrator, but rather limited it to the response and dismissal. Moreover, the judge has a relative protection that is not available in the arbitrators despite the arbitrator performs a judicial work similar to that of the general judge. Arbitration is also one of the methods of general judiciary, and that the arbitrator is entrusted with adjudicating the dispute between the parties to the litigants, similar in that to the work of the general judge, who in turn performs this work, and that the arbitration work practiced by the arbitrator is a judicial work. Keywords: arbitration, arbitrator, absolute protection of the arbitrator, relative protection of the arbitrator, penal liability of the arbitrato
Supervisor
:
Prof. Dr. Mohammad Humaid sacrificed Mazmoumi
Thesis Type
:
Master Thesis
Publishing Year
:
1444 AH
2023 AD
Added Date
:
Wednesday, August 16, 2023
Researchers
Researcher Name (Arabic)
Researcher Name (English)
Researcher Type
Dr Grade
Email
محمد خضران الزهراني
Alzahrani, Mohammed Khadran
Researcher
Master
Files
File Name
Type
Description
49300.pdf
pdf
Back To Researches Page